Author
Ahmed Barakat
Author
Share
Fact Checked by
CryptoNews Editorial Team
Author
Federal prosecutors charged former Robinhood Crypto engineers Hefu Chai, 36, and Huaisong “Jerry” Xiang, 30, with one count of commodities fraud and one count of wire fraud each, alleging they used confidential information about upcoming Robinhood token listings to trade related perpetual futures on Hyperliquid before those listings went public.
Each defendant allegedly profited more than $50,000 between 2025 and 2026, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.
The case matters beyond the dollar figures because it extends crypto insider-trading enforcement to decentralized derivatives markets, not just spot exchanges.
Prosecutors are applying commodities fraud and wire fraud theories to trading on a venue with no central listing desk or traditional KYC gatekeeper, signaling that jurisdiction over misappropriated information does not stop at a platform’s front door.
Supercharge Your Trading in 2026 With BloFin AI Trading Bots
How Did the Robinhood Engineers Use Hyperliquid to Conduct Insider Trading?
On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced charges against Chai from Menlo Park, California, and Xiang from Jersey City, New Jersey.
Both engineers at Robinhood allegedly accessed nonpublic information about upcoming cryptocurrency listings and profited by buying perpetual futures on Hyperliquid before public announcements.
The DOJ claims this violated their confidentiality obligations for personal gain. U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald emphasized that corporate insiders cannot evade laws by trading derivatives.
The commodities fraud charge carries a maximum of 10 years, while the wire fraud charge could result in up to 20 years in prison if convicted. Robinhood said it is committed to market integrity and reported the matter to authorities, cooperating fully with the investigation.
Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX
Why Perps and the Legal Theory Matter in the Insider Trading Case
Perpetual futures let traders take leveraged bets on an asset’s price without holding the token, and they never expire as long as funding payments keep them aligned with the spot price.
This makes them ideal for front-running listing announcements, since there’s no need to source the actual token and no custody risk.
The DOJ is pursuing this case under the Commodity Exchange Act and wire fraud statutes instead of securities fraud, allowing it to address derivatives trading on decentralized platforms without debating the status of underlying tokens.
This approach differs from the earlier Coinbase case involving Ishan Wahi, who was charged for sharing confidential token-listing information.
Hyperliquid, a major decentralized platform for perpetual futures, is already under regulatory scrutiny, and this case adds a criminal dimension.
The takeaway for traders is clear: pre-listing perp flow on decentralized venues now falls within the DOJ’s focus, and insiders trading through derivatives may face risks similar to those trading spot tokens directly.
The charges against Chai and Xiang are allegations only, and both defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. No trial date or plea has been reported.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Credit: Source link
